Obama’s unending war
By Pat Buchanan
Published: Friday, February 8, 2013, 8:57 p.m.
Updated: Wednesday, February 20, 2013
“When the president does it, that means that it is not illegal.”
So said Richard Nixon in his interviews with David Frost. Nixon was talking about wiretaps and surreptitious entries to protect lives and safeguard national security in a violent and anarchic war decade.
The Nixon haters pronounced themselves morally sickened.
Fast-forward to our new century. Since 9/11, we have heard more extravagant claims by American presidents.
Under George W. Bush, it was presidential authority to waterboard, torture and hold enemy aliens in indefinite detention at Guantanamo.
Under Barack Obama, we don't have a Nixon “enemies list” of folks who are not to be invited to White House dinners. Rather, we have a “kill list” — a menu from which our constitutional law professor president selects individuals to be executed abroad. And not just foreigners but Americans, too.
When may Obama order an American killed?
According to a Justice Department “white paper,” any “informed high-level official” can decide a target is a ranking operative of al-Qaida, who “poses an imminent threat of violent attack against the United States,” and if we cannot apprehend him, order him eradicated with a Hellfire missile.
And they called Nixon the imperial president.
With 3,000 to 4,500 now killed by drones in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Somalia and Yemen over 10 years, and an estimated 200 children and other civilians among the “collateral damage,” it is past time for a debate on where we are going in this “war on terror.”
A question raised by former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld years ago — Are we creating more terrorists than we are killing? — needs re-raising. For if these drone strikes that kill innocent and guilty alike are creating new millions of sympathizers for al-Qaida (and recruiting new thousands of volunteers willing to dedicate their lives to taking revenge against us), we have entered upon a war that may never end.
Al-Qaida in Afghanistan is said to be ravaged and on the run. Yet we read of al-Qaida affiliates cropping up not only in Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia, but Iraq, Syria, Libya and Mali. How many of these new cells were inspired by past drone strikes to destroy old al-Qaida cells?
The New York Times and The Washington Post have admitted they acceded to White House requests not to publish their discovery that we had established a drone base in Saudi Arabia for attacks in Yemen.
But planting a U.S. drone base on Saudi soil is no small matter. Osama bin Laden gave as a primary cause for his declaration of war on America that we had defiled the sacred soil of Arabia that is home to Mecca and Medina by planting our infidel bases there.
Is any benefit we derive from a drone base just north of Yemen worth enraging much of an Islamic world of 1.5 billion?
Congress, the administration and the American people need to ask: Why have we been unable to bring this war on terror to a “swift end”?
As U.S. citizens are forced to submit to intrusive searches before boarding airliners, one wonders: How long before the republic becomes a garrison state? If we do not end this war, this war will one day bring an end to the freedom for which the Founders fought.
Pat Buchanan is the author of “Suicide of a Superpower: Will America Survive to 2025?”
- NHL insider: Penguins’ Shero seems ready to move Letang
- Bethel Park offensive lineman Grimm picks Pitt
- Penguins notebook: Pens talking with Dupuis’ reps
- Pirates notebook: Beanballs escalate tension against Reds
- Huge sinkhole in West View detours Route 19 traffic
- Pens’ Shero talks with Letang’s agent
- Judge: Murrysville man deserves jail time for collecting child porn, threatening postal inspector
- Pitt gets commits from QB, local RB
- Pitt adds defensive recruit from Philadelphia
- Firefighters quickly extinguish Downtown restaurant fire, no one hurt
- Pirates announce signing of first-round pick McGuire
You must be signed in to add comments
To comment, click the Sign in or sign up at the very top of this page.
Well said Pat.
Submitted by: mark on Saturday, February 9, 2013
Is this the same President who campaigned against the Prison at Guantanamo, campaigned against waterboarding, won't use the words 'terrorist' or 'war', wouldn't respond to our Ambassador and 3 others being killed in Benghazi on 9-11 over a 9 hour period because 'Osama Bin Laden is dead and 'al queda' is on the run...and a response would have run contrary to his campaign narrative..he has their blood on his golf shoes.