A sadly familiar plan for Syria
By Trudy Rubin
Published: Saturday, Feb. 23, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Heaven help John Kerry! The newly minted secretary of State says he'll launch a fresh initiative aimed at ending the rule of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.
Last spring, then-Sen. Kerry appeared to grasp what was needed to break the deadly stalemate. But his current approach, and the White House's deep antipathy toward any serious U.S. involvement in Syria, mean Kerry is embarking on a mission impossible. Unless, that is, the secretary can persuade the president to change his mind.
Despite early White House expectations that Assad would fall, the Syrian struggle now is mired in a bloody stalemate in which more than 70,000 people have died and a country is being pulverized. Barring a new approach, neither side is likely to triumph in the foreseeable future.
“The more probable outcome,” according to the astute Syrian opposition activist Amr al-Azm, “is the collapse and fragmentation of the state” and possibly a sectarian genocide. The blowback could affect Turkey, Lebanon, Iraq, Jordan and Israel.
A failed Syrian state would provide a power vacuum into which outside jihadis could flow, permitting them to radicalize local Islamists and obtain dangerous weapons from captured regime arsenals. And once a state collapses — as we know from the Iraq experience — it is very difficult to rebuild.
Kerry understands this danger and warns of an “implosion” of the Syrian state. He also understands why Assad won't budge. “He thinks he's winning and the opposition is losing,” Kerry said at his confirmation hearing. “We need to change Bashar al-Assad's calculation,” he added.
Indeed, backed and armed by Russia and Iran, and aware that Washington won't give crucial antitank or antiaircraft weapons to the rebels, Assad seems confident that his regime can survive the fighting. So does Moscow.
While the rebels have managed to take control of some rural areas, no city has fallen yet. “In Bashar's calculus, he just needs to weather the storm,” Azm told me. “And he's not necessarily wrong.”
Kerry, however, believes he can change Assad's “current perception,” facilitating talks between Assad and the rebels that could offer the president a comfy exile and provide protection for his Alawite (Shiite) sect. The secretary also hopes to find more “common ground” on Syria with Moscow, despite failed administration efforts in the past.
There are no signs that Moscow is receptive. It took days for Kerry to get a return call from Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov. And the Assad regime brushed aside opposition leader Moaz al-Khatib's offer to engage in talks. Clearly, Assad does not feel a need to compromise yet.
Since his re-election, President Obama has made very clear his reluctance to consider any deeper involvement with Syria beyond increased humanitarian aid.
Last spring, Kerry talked of arming the rebels. Now, instead of charting a new strategy, he seems limited to repeating past (failed) efforts, urging Moscow to help him ease Assad into exile. Meanwhile, the regime's planes bomb cities and towns into rubble and the Syrian state rapidly collapses. The longer this goes on, the worse the outcome will be.
Trudy Rubin is a columnist for The Philadelphia Inquirer.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Bell gets respect from teammates, foes alike
- Penguins center Malkin won’t play tonight vs. Sharks
- Ex-Penguins winger Kennedy ‘emotional’ about return
- Kovacevic: Got proof on Tomlin? Let’s hear it
- VA fears budget cuts will reverse drop in homelessness
- Local protesters strike fast-food places, demand higher minimum wage
- Deb Gross to be sworn in to fill vacant Pittsburgh City Council seat
- Owner of Natrona Heights store indicted for food stamp fraud
- Film about former Pirates pitcher Dock Ellis in prestigious festival
- Detectives raid Brookline home, find drugs, cash and remove two small children
- Ex-Steeler WR Wallace: It was a ‘challenge’ for Haley to use me