Passive resistance won't kill ObamaCare either
ObamaCare haters first looked to the U.S. Supreme Court to kill health care reform. When that didn't work, they fixed their hopes on Mitt Romney's election and a Republican takeover of the U.S. Senate. Foiled again.
Opponents in Washington and state legislatures are now turning to passive resistance. If you follow the legislatures in Missouri and Kansas, you see how it works. Refuse to set up a state insurance exchange. Turn down an opportunity to reform Medicaid and get more people into health insurance. Cheer Congress as it denies federal agencies the funds needed to get the Affordable Care Act up and running.
Make the rollout as bumpy as possible. And when you detect a stumble, declare the entire law a failure.
There's just one problem with this self-fulfilling prophecy. For consumers, the law is actually working very well.
Insurers can no longer not cover a child with a pre-existing condition and that protection will apply to adults in 2014. Lifetime limits on coverage have been banned. At least 80 percent of what consumers pay in insurance premiums must be spent on medical care. New insurance plans must pay for checkups and preventive measures without co-pays or deductibles. Health plans are easier to read and understand.
A tracking service compiled by the Henry G. Kaiser Family Foundation shows that, of 57 provisions scheduled to be carried out by the end of 2012, all but two are in place, and the provisions for this year are rolling out on schedule.
The biggest, trickiest parts of the law are yet to come, however, and the efforts to obstruct are making a mark. Congress didn't expect 33 states to default to a federally run insurance marketplace. Getting the exchanges set up and ready for the start of open enrollment on Oct. 1 is looking like a titanic task, made harder by Congress' refusal to allocate sufficient funds to educate consumers on how to use the new system.
It also appears more than half the states won't expand Medicaid eligibility this year, despite the extraordinary flexibility from President Barack Obama's administration in allowing states to craft their own models.
That will prevent the Affordable Care Act from achieving its coverage goals, no doubt to the glee of the Republican governors and lawmakers who refused to cover more people. But those same obstructionists will have to explain why hundreds of thousands of citizens still can't have access to a doctor and why hospitals remain burdened with uninsured patients when federal money is available to provide them with coverage.
ObamaCare haters are too fixated on their cause to realize it is doomed. The consumer protections already in place are popular, even if the law itself isn't. Having come this far, we can't go back to the old way, in which the only real guarantee of being able to afford health care was to never, ever get sick.
The jalopy called health care reform needs money for parts and is carrying too much excess baggage. But it will continue to lurch forward, the journey made easier as the forecast disaster fails to materialize.
Barbara Shelly is a columnist for the Kansas City Star.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Roundup: Wealth gap largest on record, Pew study shows; McDonald’s in Japan limits orders of fries; more
- Starkey: Pederson had to go at Pitt
- Pederson’s 2nd tenure as the athletic director at Pitt comes to abrupt end
- Chryst returns home, named football coach at Wisconsin
- Philly DA says no affidavits claimed by AG Kane in bribery case existed
- Steelers, young and old, thirst for opportunity to reach the postseason
- QB Smith is chief concern for Steelers’ defense
- Demolition project at Oliver’s Pourhouse in Greensburg moves forward
- Home of LeNature’s exec up for sale
- Rice Energy spin-off priced below expected range
- Penguins continue to thrive, despite spate of ailments