TribLIVE

| Opinion/The Review


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

There are bigger worries than the NSA's data-mining

Daily Photo Galleries

By John Stossel
Saturday, June 15, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
 

Many libertarians are furious at the National Security Agency's data-mining operation. After all, it's the latest intrusion of Big Brother. But I can't get that worked up about it.

I know Big Data now in NSA computers probably includes my phone calls. I know the snooping may be unnecessary. Government's claim that it prevents terror is weak: Officials say a terrorist was caught but New York City police say he was caught via other methods. I'm skeptical about the very claim that any terribly important “secrets” are held by unhappy 29-year-olds and 4.8 million other people (that's how many Americans hold security clearance for classified material).

So it's invasive, probably illegal and maybe useless. I ought to be very angry. But I'm not.

Terrorists do want to murder us. If the NSA is halfway competent, Big Data should help detect plots. And my electronic privacy has already been utterly shredded by Google, Amazon, YouTube and so on.

They know with whom I talk, what interests me and how much time I spend doing this or that. They creep me out with targeted ads. How did they know I want that?! Oh, right, I spent an hour searching.

Then I go outside in New York City, where 16 cameras record me on my way to work. Greedy lawyers can subpoena my private records. My employer has a right to read my emails. My privacy is already blown.

I'm angrier about other things Big Government does in the name of keeping me safe — forcing me to wear safety gear, limiting where I may go, stripping me at airports, forcing me to pay $2,300 for more military than we need.

Much of America's defense spending goes to defend our allies in Europe and Asia. They spend less because we spend more. And it's not clear that we do what we do efficiently. The U.S. Department of Defense is prone to the same sorts of inefficiency that plagues other parts of government. The department's brownie recipe is 26 pages long.

Military officials say al-Qaida has been weakened. Iran (someday) may build a nuclear bomb but we managed to deter China and Russia when they had thousands.

Some people want the U.S. military to police the world: contain China, transform failed states, chase terrorists, train foreign militaries, protect sea lanes, protect oil supplies, stop genocide, protect refugees, maintain bases in allied countries, police our southern border, stop drug trafficking and spread good through humanitarian missions. The list is endless, which is the problem.

The U.S. military can't be everywhere. And we can't hand the government unlimited power and unlimited money every time a potential crisis looms.

We must remain on guard against threats. But bankruptcy may be the greatest threat.

John Stossel is host of “Stossel” on the Fox Business Network. He's the author of “No They Can't: Why Government Fails, but Individuals Succeed.”

 

 
 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Stories

  1. Cambodian students answer Oakmont group’s prayers
  2. Inmate wants confiscated cash back so he can hire attorney
  3. Review: Buffett keeps faith with fans on ‘This One’s for You’ tour
  4. Steelers are in familiar territory going into training camp in Latrobe
  5. Pirates notebook: Recovering Cole exceeds expectations in simulated game
  6. Recalling 20 years of memories at Freeport Invitational
  7. Leechburg Area School District contracts with Pittsburgh firm for online database
  8. Lincoln council passes ordinances to help ‘protect residents’
  9. Armstrong sheriff replaces patrol cars with newer models
  10. Donora seems ready to sue over school sale
  11. Charleroi woman behind bars for growing marijuana at home
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.