Cubans fight for equality
“More than half a century ago, Fidel decreed the elimination of racism,” said Leonardo Calvo Cardenas. But “this just made the problem deeper and more complex.”
Calvo Cardenas is a black Cuban — a group that makes up roughly half of Cuba's population but that is greatly underrepresented in its political leadership, media and nascent business class. Calvo Cardenas hasn't always been on the outside looking in. “I was the director of the Lenin Museum,” he told me during a visit to Washington this month.
But Calvo Cardenas' days in the Lenin stacks came to an abrupt end in 1991, when he and his friend Manuel Cuesta Morua, a historian at Havana's Casa de Africa Museum, lost their jobs after publicly criticizing the Castro regime's lack of democracy. The two went on to form a democratic socialist organization that the regime routinely harasses but, atypically, hasn't stamped out.
“We were the first alternative political movement that publicly opposed the U.S. embargo,” said Cuesta Morua, who accompanied Calvo Cardenas on his visit. “That makes it more difficult for the Cuban government to give us the kind of treatment that other dissidents have gotten.”
In 2008, the two joined other activists to form the Citizens Committee for Racial Integration — an organization whose very name is an indictment of their beleaguered workers' paradise. “The Afro-Cuban population is stagnant, at the bottom of the social pyramid,” Juan Antonio Madrazo Luna, the committee's national coordinator, said during the recent trip. As in virtually every other nation in the Western Hemisphere, Calvo Cardenas added, “Cuba has traditionally had a racially stratified workforce. And despite the egalitarian rhetoric of the government, African descendants remain excluded from the most promising jobs.”
None of the committee representatives accused the Castros of harboring racial bias. The problem that the Castros and the Communist Party have with the committee is that an independent movement for racial equality is a living, breathing refutation of the idea that, after more than 50 years in power, Communism has delivered equality. Another problem for the party is that any independent movement is inherently not under its control. For black Cubans, the road to equality is blocked by the party's suppression of civil society.
In recent years, Cuba's economic travails have made the nation's racial rifts more visible. Still, “the government hasn't waged a public anti-racism campaign,” Madrazo said, as doing so would have required acknowledging the persistence of racism under Cuban Communism. So the Afro-Cuban activists formed the committee themselves. The group not only promotes racial equality but also has a gay and lesbian chapter and presents annual awards to human rights advocates and champions of pluralism.
In a more repressive period, of course, the committee's leaders would be languishing in jail and its activities would be conducted underground, if at all. Today, the Communists are encouraging a modest wave of small-scale entrepreneurialism, though a movement to a more market-oriented economy is no guarantee of democratization, as the examples of the Soviet Union in the 1920s and China today make abundantly clear.
Nonetheless, a little political space not occupied by the party has opened up in Cuba — and the committee is one of a handful of groups that, not without risk, seek to expand it.
Harold Meyerson is editor-at-large of The American Prospect magazine.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Steelers swap draft pick for Eagles cornerback
- Rossi: Looking at the next great Steeler
- After early criticism, Haley has Steelers offense poised to be even better
- GOP convention host Cleveland shaking off Rust Belt image
- Missing deaf, autistic teen last seen on North Side
- Steelers notebook: Injuries finally become issue at training camp
- Reds solve Cole, stave off Pirates’ 9th-inning rally
- Penguins not alone in top-heavy approach to salary cap
- Shell shovels $30M into proposed Beaver County plant site
- Implant gives epileptics chance at ‘new life’
- Inside the Steelers: QB Jones continues to get majority of snaps