TribLIVE

| Opinion/The Review


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Nobody has a license to limit liberty

Daily Photo Galleries

By Steve Chapman
Friday, July 5, 2013, 8:57 p.m.
 

One reason Americans have moved so rapidly toward support of same-sex marriage is their stubborn bias toward liberty. When interest groups demand something material, or when they seek to take something from other groups, the public is apt to resist.

But when a group asks to live and let live, it can usually count on getting its way.

Legal scholars have long thought that if the Supreme Court upheld same-sex marriage, it would base that decision on the 14th Amendment's guarantee of “the equal protection of the laws.” When Justice Anthony Kennedy made the case for overturning the Defense of Marriage Act, though, he relied on a different provision. DOMA, he wrote, “is a deprivation of an essential part of the liberty protected by the Fifth Amendment.”

Even Americans who have moral qualms about gay marriage may not think the law should try to dictate morality.

So how did staunch opponents of gay rights react to the decisions striking down DOMA while upholding marriage equality in California? By claiming that it would trample on their rights.

Thomas Peters, the communications director for the National Organization for Marriage, told me, “Same-sex marriage and religious freedom don't coexist very well. In fact, they probably are mutually exclusive.”

Bryan Fischer of the American Family Association called the DOMA verdict “the greatest threat to the First Amendment in history.” The Liberty Institute said the rulings will mean “attempts to use government to punish those who disagree” and “create a climate of fear and oppression.”

It's a bit rich for these groups to complain that the court is infringing on their freedom to infringe on the freedom of gays. Advocates of same-sex marriage are not trying to exclude heterosexuals from matrimony. They are only asking to be free to practice it, as well.

But opponents charge that churches will be forced to host same-sex weddings and their clergy will be required to perform them. Churches that refuse, they say, may be stripped of their tax-exempt status.

The likelihood that any of these fears will come to pass ranges from minimal to zero. State laws allow divorce, but Catholic priests haven't been forced to preside at the weddings of divorced Catholics. Nor have such internal church polices led to the loss of standard tax exemptions.

The only real friction comes in areas where religious institutions provide public accommodations or act as agents of government. A Methodist organization in New Jersey lost a special tax break for an open-air pavilion after it refused to let a lesbian couple use it for a civil union ceremony. Catholic Charities abandoned the adoption business in Illinois rather than work with same-sex couples in civil unions.

The idea that believers will suffer rank oppression is a fantasy.

The only liberty they will lose is the liberty to deprive others of their liberty. Sorry, but that's one freedom a free society doesn't offer.

Steve Chapman blogs daily at newsblogs.chicagotribune.com/steve_chapman.

 

 
 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Stories

  1. Arnold man charged after 20-mile chase
  2. McKeesport park to get more regional asset funds
  3. Gunfire plagues New Kensington
  4. Falcons to host ‘Kitty Cat Game’
  5. Monessen woman honored for service as church volunteer
  6. Home brew returns
  7. Mental health facility won’t take Franklin Regional stabbing suspect as patient
  8. Business roundup: SEC fines Bank of America $7.65M for miscalculation; court-ordered anti-smoking ads challenged; more
  9. Penguins notebook: Wild beat Pens behind Pominville’s hat trick
  10. Steelers film session: Harrison on the field often
  11. At least $100,000 in appliances stolen from new homes around Western Pa.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.