TribLIVE

| Opinion/The Review


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Nobody has a license to limit liberty

Daily Photo Galleries

By Steve Chapman
Friday, July 5, 2013, 8:57 p.m.
 

One reason Americans have moved so rapidly toward support of same-sex marriage is their stubborn bias toward liberty. When interest groups demand something material, or when they seek to take something from other groups, the public is apt to resist.

But when a group asks to live and let live, it can usually count on getting its way.

Legal scholars have long thought that if the Supreme Court upheld same-sex marriage, it would base that decision on the 14th Amendment's guarantee of “the equal protection of the laws.” When Justice Anthony Kennedy made the case for overturning the Defense of Marriage Act, though, he relied on a different provision. DOMA, he wrote, “is a deprivation of an essential part of the liberty protected by the Fifth Amendment.”

Even Americans who have moral qualms about gay marriage may not think the law should try to dictate morality.

So how did staunch opponents of gay rights react to the decisions striking down DOMA while upholding marriage equality in California? By claiming that it would trample on their rights.

Thomas Peters, the communications director for the National Organization for Marriage, told me, “Same-sex marriage and religious freedom don't coexist very well. In fact, they probably are mutually exclusive.”

Bryan Fischer of the American Family Association called the DOMA verdict “the greatest threat to the First Amendment in history.” The Liberty Institute said the rulings will mean “attempts to use government to punish those who disagree” and “create a climate of fear and oppression.”

It's a bit rich for these groups to complain that the court is infringing on their freedom to infringe on the freedom of gays. Advocates of same-sex marriage are not trying to exclude heterosexuals from matrimony. They are only asking to be free to practice it, as well.

But opponents charge that churches will be forced to host same-sex weddings and their clergy will be required to perform them. Churches that refuse, they say, may be stripped of their tax-exempt status.

The likelihood that any of these fears will come to pass ranges from minimal to zero. State laws allow divorce, but Catholic priests haven't been forced to preside at the weddings of divorced Catholics. Nor have such internal church polices led to the loss of standard tax exemptions.

The only real friction comes in areas where religious institutions provide public accommodations or act as agents of government. A Methodist organization in New Jersey lost a special tax break for an open-air pavilion after it refused to let a lesbian couple use it for a civil union ceremony. Catholic Charities abandoned the adoption business in Illinois rather than work with same-sex couples in civil unions.

The idea that believers will suffer rank oppression is a fantasy.

The only liberty they will lose is the liberty to deprive others of their liberty. Sorry, but that's one freedom a free society doesn't offer.

Steve Chapman blogs daily at newsblogs.chicagotribune.com/steve_chapman.

 

 
 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Stories

  1. Starkey: Chryst a miserable failure at Pitt
  2. Real estate union: Howard Hanna buys Langholz Wilson Ellis
  3. Pouliot scores in NHL debut as Penguins tame Panthers
  4. Ex-Penguins defenseman Niskanen still miffed by coaches’ firings
  5. Pitt players support Rudolph for job
  6. Steelers’ Bell, Chiefs’ Charles elevating running back position in NFL
  7. Pitt football fights to overcome steppingstone status
  8. Jeannette company’s miniature steam engines coveted for decades
  9. Westmoreland County furloughs weights and measurements director
  10. Pair of NYC officers killed in ambush shooting
  11. 3 charged in East Deer home invasion
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.