Share This Page

Zombies of a social revolution

| Friday, Aug. 23, 2013, 8:57 p.m.

Last week, Christopher Lane, 22, an Australian here on a baseball scholarship, was shot and killed while jogging in Duncan, Okla. Police have three suspects, two black and one white. The latter allegedly said they were bored and decided to shoot Lane for “the fun of it.”

As Lane was white and the alleged shooter black, racism has surfaced as a motive.

What happened in Oklahoma and the reaction, or lack of reaction, to it tells us much about America in 2013, not much of it good.

Teenagers who shoot and kill a man out of summertime boredom are moral barbarians, dead souls.

But who created these monsters? Surely one explanation lies in the fact that the old conscience-forming and character-forming institutions — home, church, school and a moral and healthy culture fortifying basic truths — have collapsed. And the community hardest hit is black America.

If we go back to the end of World War II, 90 percent of black families consisted of a mother and father and children raised and disciplined by their parents. Today, 73 percent of black kids are born to single moms. In some cities, the black-dropout rate can hit as high as 50 percent.

Among black males ages 18 to 29 in urban areas, often a third are in prison or jail, or on probation or parole, or walking around with a criminal record.

Where do the kids get their ideas of right and wrong? In homes where the father is absent and the TV is always on. From radios tuned in to rap and hip-hop. From films where Hollywood values prevail and the shooting never stops. From street gangs that sometimes form the only families these kids have ever known.

Still, crime has fallen since 1990, we are told. But that is only because the baby boomers, the largest population cohort in our history, passed out of the high-crime age group a quarter of a century ago and because the jail and prison population in America has tripled.

What kind of leadership do we see today in black America?

When Trayvon Martin was shot to death in Sanford, Fla., Jesse Jackson rushed there to declare: “Blacks are under attack. ... Killing us is big business.” Trayvon was “shot down in cold blood by a vigilante ... murdered and martyred.”

After Chris Lane's cold-blooded murder, Jackson tweeted: This sort of thing is to be “frowned upon.”

Since Lyndon Johnson took office 50 years ago, we have spent trillions on his programs for health care, housing, education, food stamps, welfare and civil rights. Are we living in that Great Society we were promised?

In that same decade, we were told that the social, cultural and moral revolution bursting forth on college campuses would rid us of the repressive old-time morality and lead to a more equal, humane and better America.

Yet, are not the alleged killers of Chris Lane, who reportedly shot him for the fun of it, the “do-your-own-thing!” children of that cultural revolution?

In the real America, interracial violence is overwhelmingly black-on-white. Even if the media will not report it, everybody knows it.

For liberals, America is always “Mississippi Burning.” It just has to be that way.

Pat Buchanan is the author of “Suicide of a Superpower: Will America Survive to 2025?”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.