America's unfinished business
By Michelle Malkin
Published: Sunday, Sept. 15, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
A dozen years after the 9/11 attacks, the trials against the accused jihadist plotters who incinerated pregnant women, firefighters, grandparents, newlyweds, toddlers and schoolchildren have yet to begin.
Justice not only has been delayed and denied. Justice has been demoted, disowned and deserted.
The terror-coddling Obama White House squandered precious years trying to shut down Gitmo to appease the peaceniks, transnationalists and Muslim grievance-mongers. President Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder arrogantly attempted to shove civilian trials of the accused terrorists — which would have been held a stone's throw from Ground Zero — down New Yorkers' throats. Ever since, Team Obama has dragged its feet on military tribunals for the al-Qaida crew.
If we're lucky — that's a big if — the war-crime trials for Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (KSM) and his alleged co-conspirators may begin in the fall of 2014. Maybe. Thanks to cunning delays, made-for-media theatrics and stomach-turning whining by the Gitmo detainees, the journey to hold the alleged 9/11 plotters accountable has become a vulgar joke.
And if the clogged wheels of justice for 9/11 victims weren't bad enough, don't forget: In 2009, the Obama administration dropped the charges against 2000 U.S.S. Cole bombing suspect, Gitmo detainee and former Persian Gulf operations chief for al-Qaida Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri — and has made no progress on bringing him to justice since reinstating the charges (only under public pressure) in 2011.
How is it that America is poised to use its military — the American people's, not Obama's — for a humanitarian intervention in Syria that may very well aid and abet the same barbaric forces that brought unprecedented death and destruction to New York City, near Shanksville, Pa., and Washington, D.C., just 12 short unavenged years ago?
How is it that we prosecuted 2009 Fort Hood jihadist Nidal Hasan quicker than his Islamist brethren who allegedly orchestrated the 2001 terror plot that killed more than 2,700 innocent men, women and children?
Remember: The Bush administration first brought military charges of conspiracy, murder in violation of the law of war, attacking civilians, hijacking aircraft and terrorism against KSM and his Quran-inspired crew in 2008. Obama recklessly aborted those military tribunals in his bleeding-heart social justice bid to provide full U.S. constitutional protections for the foreign soldiers of Allah.
It took the united stand of 9/11 families, veterans, anti-jihad watchdogs and first responders in Manhattan in late 2009 to force Obama and Holder to retreat. That's the unapologetic vigilance America was supposed to have adopted after the planes crashed, the towers fell and the ashes choked the air. Instead, America's leaders have allowed jihadists to make a mockery of justice. Muslim Brotherhood radicals waltz freely in and out of the nation's capital. Border security remains a joke.
I'm sick of 9/11 anniversary ceremonies by politicians who pay lip service to peace and justice for our country but refuse to secure them. Remembrance is worthless without resolve. Resolve is useless without action.
Want to honor the 9/11 dead? Take care of unfinished business here at home. Put America first.
Michelle Malkin is the author of “Culture of Corruption: Obama and his Team of Tax Cheats, Crooks and Cronies” (Regnery 2009).
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- McCutchen proposes to girlfriend on DeGeneres show
- Police: Driver fell unconscious before Seton Hill bus crash
- Pirates make inquiry into former Cy Young winner Johan Santana
- Jeannette man accused in assault with tire iron
- Starkey: NHL stuck in stone age
- Theft charges added against Penn Hills father, son accused in TV converter box scheme
- Pirates sign Morton to 3-year extension
- PNC plans to do away with tellers
- For the rest of us: Festivus pole put up at Fla. Capitol
- Penguins’ Neal apologizes, vows to be better
- RBS paying $100M to settle US, NY sanction claims