Share This Page

Millennials should opt out of ObamaCare

| Monday, Sept. 30, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

In preparation for the rollout of Affordable Care Act, the Obama administration is taking its message to college campuses like the University of Pittsburgh to sign up as many students as possible. It's even brought on board Lady Gaga, Jennifer Hudson, Amy Poehler and other celebrities to help convince Millennials that the exchanges are cool.

Apparently the administration thinks Millennials are gullible. No veneer of popularity can mask the exchange system's deep problems. The simple fact is that they are a bad deal for young people. It makes more financial sense for Millennials to opt out of ObamaCare than to join its ranks.

The most obvious problem with the exchange system is how it perversely relies on a system of generational redistribution. Quite simply, the law takes from the young to subsidize the old. That's why the White House is so set on getting young people to sign up — without our money, the system won't work and the exchanges will enter what has been called a “death spiral.”

What's missing in this political calculus is the realization that young people are the least able to afford to purchase health care. In an era of sky-high student loan debt, 16.1 percent unemployment, and stagnating and even falling salaries, ObamaCare is estimated to increase insurance premiums for young people by an average of 169 percent.

Another sticking point is the law's “Federal Data Services Hub.” This term is at best a euphemism; the Data Hub is an enormous database of every participant's private medical records, tax and financial info, legal history and other intimate information that we probably wouldn't want out in the open.

There are way too many hands in this overflowing informational cookie jar. Local law enforcement, insurance companies and innumerable federal agencies and low-level bureaucrats will have access to the Data Hub's treasure trove of personal info. Even the law's “navigators” — employees from nongovernmental groups, some of which are politically controversial — will have access to the database. It's an astounding assault on privacy and it's no surprise that it's being challenged in court.

These problems, along with others, have even caused Congress to exempt itself from the exchange. Similarly, unions, corporations, and others with political connections have received waivers or extensions from the administration. Not everyone has been so lucky.

Thankfully, Millennials have one remaining option: opt out of ObamaCare. This allows them to pay a small penalty, which then frees them to purchase health insurance outside the exchange system. That insurance can be specifically tailored to their individual needs — and it won't have the drawbacks that make the exchange system so unappealing.

Young people can save a substantial amount of money by taking this road. A recent study by the National Center for Public Policy Research estimates that 3.7 million Americans between ages 18 and 34 will save at least $500. A full 3 million will even save as much as $1,000. Opting out of ObamaCare is thus an attractive option for Millennials, who tend to be healthy and need a greater share of their paychecks in order to make ends meet.

Of course, the alternative is for them to join an exchange system that both picks their pockets and shares their secrets. No celebrity is popular enough to gloss over that.

Evan Feinberg is president of Generation Opportunity, a national, nonpartisan organization advocating for economic opportunity for young people through less government and more freedom.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.