| Opinion/The Review

Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Keep Asia in forefront of U.S. foreign policy

Email Newsletters

Sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Daily Photo Galleries

By Matthew Goodman & Michael Green
Saturday, Oct. 12, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

President Barack Obama's decision to cancel his visits to the economic and political summits in Asia is a setback for the U.S. position in the region. As Woody Allen said, 80 percent of life is showing up and this is especially true of diplomacy in Asia.

But having planned and participated in similar trips for this president and for George W. Bush, we also know that the extent of the damage will depend on what the White House does next.

This is not the first time a president has pulled out of diplomatic engagements in Asia because of domestic politics. In 1995, President Bill Clinton canceled his trip to a regional economic summit in Osaka, Japan, because of a federal government shutdown. He was widely criticized at the time but recovered the following spring with highly successful visits to Japan and Korea that resulted in far-reaching changes to our alliances.

Today, nobody remembers that Clinton did not go to Osaka. In 1998, Clinton pulled out of a summit in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, and sent Vice President Al Gore in his place. In the midst of Asia's worst financial crisis and major strains between Washington and regional capitals over the proper remedies, Gore gave an ill-advised “reformasi” speech, criticizing the host country and amplifying the impression that Washington did not get the region.

Everyone in Asia remembers that summit and U.S. diplomats are still repairing the diplomatic and strategic damage.

This time, the stakes are higher. Asia-Pacific economies account for more than half of global gross domestic product and Asia is the fastest-growing part of the world economy. Governments across the region are worried about China's increasing assertiveness and are eager for more active U.S. diplomatic, military and economic engagement to maintain a favorable balance of power.

Not surprisingly, polls show that a plurality of Americans consider Asia the most important region for U.S. interests. Obama's announcement in his first term that the United States would “pivot” or “rebalance” to the Pacific was broadly welcomed but doubts have grown. The driver of the strategy, Hillary Clinton, is out of government; sequestration has weakened the Pentagon's ability to shift to the Pacific; and the president's recent address to the United Nations appeared to signal that his core focus going forward would be the Middle East.

The president needs to reinvest in his Asia policy. The administration's actions over the next few months will determine whether this cancellation is seen as a blip or a longer-term setback to U.S. relations with the world's most dynamic region.

Matthew Goodman, a former member of the National Security Council staff in the Obama administration, is a chair in political economy at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. Michael Green is senior vice president for Asia at CSIS and a professor at Georgetown University. He served on the National Security Council staff in the George W. Bush administration.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.



Show commenting policy

Most-Read Stories

  1. Steelers kicker Boswell puts best foot forward
  2. McIntyre students hope Buddy Bench is beneficial to all
  3. South Fayette, Aliquippa form unique traditions for Thanksgiving Day
  4. Gorman: Look out for unsung hero
  5. Steelers notebook: Tomlin not grooming successor to RB Williams
  6. Occupying playoff spot on Thanksgiving good harbinger for Penguins
  7. Penn State suffers home loss to Radford
  8. West Virginia football team finds late-season mean streak
  9. Kiski Area boys a team in transition after graduation of top scorer
  10. Penn State-West Virginia rivalry renews at Elite Eight
  11. Expanded roster helps boost Kiski Area girls