Lawmakers wrong on UPMC-Highmark fight
By Stephen Demaura
Published: Monday, Feb. 3, 2014, 9:00 p.m.
As a Pennsylvania resident and the president of Americans for Job Security, I am dismayed that lawmakers in our state are choosing big-government policies over free-market principles. State Reps. Jim Christiana, R-Beaver, and Dan Frankel, D-Allegheny, have already introduced legislation that would force University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) and Highmark Inc. into a contract. This week, state Sens. Randy Vulakovich, R-Shaler Township, and Jay Costa, D-Forest Hills, are expected to introduce companion legislation in the Senate.
Their legislation would kill market competition and limit affordable consumer choices by forcing the two entities that offer both health insurance and health care into a contract. Not surprisingly, their legislation has the backing of liberal groups such as the Service Employees International Union.
Millions of Americans have lost their health insurance or are experiencing higher premiums due to President Obama's flawed health care law. ObamaCare has shown Americans what happens when the government oversteps its bounds in the health care marketplace. Lack of competition in the marketplace will always lead to increased costs and decreased quality of care, which is why action by these Pennsylvania legislators is so concerning.
The health care fight is between Highmark and UPMC. Highmark is Western Pennsylvania's largest health insurer and it has also recently acquired a network of struggling hospitals. UPMC, as it's known locally, is the region's largest health network. It is also an insurance provider.
After a decade-long contract, UPMC chose cut its ties with Highmark. As a private entity, that is its decision to make.
Highmark isn't hurting as a result. It just partnered with the world-renowned Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center. This is a strong demonstration that competition in the marketplace works.
State legislators have no business entering into a fight between these two private entities. Their decision to follow big-government health care policies like ObamaCare could have a chilling effect on the marketplace if other states take similar steps. It could also set the stage for one large insurer to continue dominating the market, further threatening all hospitals in Pennsylvania and across the country.
Americans for Job Security takes pride in fighting for policies that strengthen free-market forces to modernize the health care sector. We support solutions that are grounded in free-market principles, solutions that spur economic growth and further enable our health care system to absorb the shock of ObamaCare.
The legislation spearheaded by Reps. Christiana and Frankel and Sens. Vulakovich and Costa flies in the face of everything we stand for.
The Insurance Federation of Pennsylvania and the Hospital Association of Pennsylvania both oppose this brazen attempt to increase Harrisburg's role in private health care decisions. I encourage you to join this fight as well.
If you want health care policies that promote free-market principles and lead to quality and affordable care in Pennsylvania and across this country, please call your state representative and senator today and tell them to say no to this egregious overreach.
Stephen DeMaura is president of Americans for Job Security.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Samsung introduces free streaming radio service
- Minorities crucial to filling Marcellus shale gas drilling jobs
- Web of surveillance videos helps ensnare suspect in East Liberty slayings
- Greensburg woman accused of assaulting nurse in Excela Health Westmoreland Hospital
- TJ boys hang on despite foul trouble
- Kittanning’s Nolf 1 win away from 3rd PIAA title
- Jeannette to use grant to secure Monsour
- Unity woman loses appeal of DUI conviction
- National expert tells Pittsburgh providers to expect a cost crisis in cancer care
- $220K payout proposed to avoid lawsuit against Pennsylvania Game Commission
- Health research at state’s universities at risk if tobacco settlement funds axed