“What irony. Now we will have spent $800 million on a road from Washington County to a billion-dollar airport and beltway (in 1992 dollars) that is handling a third to a fourth of the capacity it was built for and with 12,000 fewer airport-related jobs when US Air flew the coop.”
— Jake Haulk, president of the Allegheny Institute for Public Policy, on the groundbreaking for the latest phase of the Southern Beltway.
• • • • •
“(D)emocracy needs to be emancipated from capitalism. As long as we inhabit a capitalistic democracy, a future of racial equality, gender equality, economic equality will elude us.”
— former Communist and Black Panther Angela Davis, from an interview with the Los Angeles Times.
• • • • •
“Smaller banks, thanks to (the) Dodd-Frank (Act) and its progeny, are increasingly becoming fish food for bigger banks. If current trends continue, community banks may just qualify for protection under the Endangered Species Act.”
— Lee Habeeb & Mike Leven, writing at National Review Online.
• • • • •
“A prudent scientist would acknowledge that his hypothesis of man-made global warming is flawed, contradicted by contrary data. True scientists would rework their hypothesis to explain the contradictions.”
— Brian Joondeph, a Denver physician, writing in the American Thinker.
• • • • •
“If (House Speaker John Boehner) thinks Congress has the power to arrest Lois Lerner for contempt, now is the time. If he shrinks from sending the sergeant at arms to bring her to the Capitol jail after the full House held her in contempt, he's weakening his own institution.”
— Seth Lipsky, writing in the New York Post.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.