Stop illegal alien relocation
About those 300 U.S. military advisers that the Obama administration has ordered to Iraq: They belong on the U.S. border with Mexico. They are urgently needed to assess what U.S. military force should be deployed immediately to secure our own border, not Iraq's border, from what is surely the most unconventional and, I believe, the most dangerous war in our history.
As tens of thousands of so-called unaccompanied alien children crash our southern border, we are undergoing a war against the existence, the concept of, the USA as a nation-state.
But the existential danger here comes not from the assault itself. Nightmarishly, it comes from the Obama administration, which, in its greatest betrayal, is leading, or at least supporting, the aliens' charge.
A normal government would have taken immediate steps to halt these border crossings and set in motion the deportation efforts necessary to return these illegals to their home countries.
But the Obama administration is not a normal government. It saw these veritable columns of minor aliens forming, and, rather than stop them from entering the country, actually sought to help them.
How do I know this? From a Department of Homeland Security solicitation notice that appeared six months ago at the federal business opportunities site, FedBizOpps.gov. The notice seeks “Escort Services for Unaccompanied Alien Children,” describing exactly the services now required to process, not deport, this massive influx.
DHS, the notice states, has “a continuing and mission critical responsibility for accepting custody of unaccompanied alien children ... and transporting these juveniles to Office of Refugee Resettlement shelters located throughout the continental United States.”
Take Lawrenceville, a tiny town in southern Virginia. One day last month, Lawrenceville woke up to discover that Washington was unilaterally about to turn this town of 1,400 citizens into the host for 500 illegal minors. A grassroots uproar brought a halt to Washington's designs.
I can hear the resettlement crowd asking: “Where is the compassion?” “Where is the charity?” But what they're really looking for is taxpayer money.
As Ann Corcoran, purveyor of the website Refugee Resettlement Watch, has taught me, population replacement is big business, and the zealous bureaucrats who seek to “fundamentally transform” this country make a good, taxpayer-funded living while they're at it.
You're paying for that new illegal minor alien facility now opening in Tucson — the 17th such facility operated by a group called Southwest Key, with an annual budget of more than $150 million, according to NBC affiliate KVOA, “most of which comes from federal government contracts.”
You're paying for the “migration and refugee services” of the very preachy U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops. As Corcoran writes, “It is not Christian charity when the ‘church' is paid by the taxpayers to do charitable work.”
No, it's a big Washington con. Don't fall for it. Hold the line. United, maybe we don't need the cavalry.
Diana West can be contacted via email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Man charged with playing doctor for free Nemacolin stay
- Nor’easter causing flight delays at Pittsburgh International
- Steelers cornerback Taylor ready to swap earpiece for helmet
- Lawyers agree to dismiss Penn Hills High School student lawsuit
- Cancer didn’t stop mother from living for her son
- Ehrhoff finding his way with Penguins
- Steelers’ lookahead: New Orleans Saints
- DUI checkpoints take on dangerous drivers
- Review: ‘Newsies’ a great addition to musical standards
- Penguins notebook: Bennett status remains fluid
- U.S. Steel Tower tenants stand to benefit from company’s relocation