Share This Page

A cover-up by any other name

| Monday, July 21, 2014, 9:00 p.m.

At this point in Barack Obama's presidency, it's easy to see that the administration uses a well thought out playbook to address scandal after scandal. Stonewalling Congress and failing to hold people accountable are standard practices. But there's another tactic used by Team Obama that hasn't been getting enough attention — the announcement of an investigation by internal government “watchdogs” into wrongdoing on any particular issue, the outcome of which is never actually completed.

Consider the IRS targeting scandal. Despite news breaking more than a year ago that the most powerful government agency in the country was inappropriately targeting conservative groups, it has taken the FBI more than 14 months to ask the people who received the most scrutiny for an interview.

“I believe in earnest this is the first time they've said they're going to take us seriously and that they're going to investigate,” said True the Vote President Catherine Engelbrecht in an interview with Greta Van Susteren of Fox News. “This has been such a rat race from the very beginning, and I'm very glad, I'm very glad that we're going to have an opportunity to sit down and get to the truth of this.”

Despite the delay, Attorney General Eric Holder said in a recent interview that investigators were doing a “good and professional job.” Conveniently, the woman in charge of the DOJ investigation into IRS targeting, Barbara Bosserman, has donated thousands of dollars to Democrats and President Barack Obama over the years.

When President Obama made the decision to exchange five Taliban commanders for alleged deserter Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, he expected a political victory. The opposite occurred as members of Bergdahl's platoon came forward to expose him. Two months after a so-called investigation into Bergdahl's disappearance began, not a single member of his platoon has been interviewed by the military about the circumstances surrounding his disappearance.

“Since Gen. (Kenneth) Dahl announced ... he is the leader of the new investigation into why Bergdahl deserted, he has not contacted any of us. Nobody in the platoon,” Army Spc. Cody Full, who served with Bergdahl when he disappeared in 2009, said in an interview with Sean Hannity.

Real and complete investigations might show the president of the United States knew the IRS was targeting conservatives and might show the president knowingly swapped a deserter for five high-level Taliban fighters. Obama can't have that, which is exactly why these investigations have gone nowhere.

When the administration says it's investigating a scandal or wrongdoing, it's actually using the “investigation” as a way to avoid answering questions and to avoid getting to the bottom what actually happened. After all, government officials can't answer questions or talk about details when there's an “ongoing investigation.”

Katie Pavlich is news editor of Townhall.com. Her exclusive Trib columns usually appear on the first and third Fridays of each month.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.