ShareThis Page
Joseph Sabino Mistick

Will Michael Cohen tough it out?

| Saturday, April 28, 2018, 5:11 p.m.
President Donald Trump's personal lawyer Michael Cohen (center) leaves the U.S. Courthouse in New York on April 26, 2018.
AFP/Getty Images
President Donald Trump's personal lawyer Michael Cohen (center) leaves the U.S. Courthouse in New York on April 26, 2018.

“I can do two years standing on my head.” That was once the mantra of tough guys who were looking at a stint in prison, but you do not hear it much anymore.

Things change, and between mandatory sentences and strict sentencing guidelines, especially at the federal level, the boast is not so simple. These days, even the toughest among the accused must decide if they can do 10 or 20 or even more years — standing on their heads.

Depending on your age, a sentence like that can be a game ender. If you are older, a long sentence becomes a life sentence, with a strong possibility that you will die in prison.

If you are younger, you face the prospect of never seeing your kids grow up, along with losing family and friends. And, when you are finally released, you will enter a new and different world, alone and without prospects.

Those are the things that Michael Cohen, Donald Trump's personal lawyer, could be pondering lately. After federal agents raided Cohen's office and hotel room, seizing files and electronic devices, no one could blame him for imagining the worst.

Cohen has not been charged with anything and he may not be. But, he has been around he block a few times, and he knows the drill.

In “Behind Bars,” a handbook of sorts for folks who are facing prison time, authors Jeffrey Ian Ross and Stephen C. Richards describe what is a familiar scene to anyone who has spent time in the legal trenches.

“You might think you'd never snitch on your friends or acquaintances or plead guilty to a crime, but you might end up singing like a bird … ”

Your interrogators may threaten to arrest your family and confiscate your assets “to compel confessions, collaborating testimony and plea bargains.”

Cohen's Ukrainian-immigrant in-laws have invested successfully in New York City, but their success, along with their Russian associates, is now drawing unwanted attention, making Cohen even more vulnerable to this approach on other fronts.

Ross and Richards call all this “the mathematics of terror,” but Cohen still has some cards to play. Lawyer-client confidentiality and presidential power weigh heavily on his future.

In Politico last week, Josh Gerstein wrote, “Although Trump's detractors are rooting for Trump's personal attorney to flip on the president ... legal obstacles make it difficult for lawyers to expose their clients' guarded secrets.” The privilege belongs to Trump, and it is not Cohen's to waive.

Plus, there is always the possibility of a presidential pardon, but that would only free him from prosecution for federal crimes. If there are parallel state investigations, even the president of the United States could not stop those prosecutions.

There are still a few tough guys out there, unwilling to flip on someone in exchange for the guarantee of a lighter sentence. Some are innocent, and pleading guilty to anything would be an unimaginable concession. Others remain bound to an old-fashioned notion of personal honor.

Michael Cohen is in a tight spot. And, while he may have fancied himself as a tough guy up until now, things change.

Joseph Sabino Mistick is a Pittsburgh lawyer (joemistick.com).

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me