Skin in the game
By Joseph Sabino Mistick
Published: Saturday, Feb. 16, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Aside from the Levon Helm tribute at last week's Grammy Awards, the big talk was about Katy Perry's dress. Perry must not have received the CBS memo that prohibited bare skin on the broadcast because she sported a mint-green number with an open window of sorts at the top where there is often fabric.
As a result, Perry exhibited quite a bit about herself, not unlike Republicans at the State of the Union address a few days later. There always is more than a little show biz at the annual presidential report to Congress and this year was no different.
Keeping track of who clapped and who sat on his hands is fun. It's easy to imagine President Obama's guys coming up with lines sure to bait the opposition and then exchanging mirthful texts when wholesome proposals to protect our children or save the environment are met with Republican sourpusses.
It makes you wonder why these politicians take the bait. What public official, knowing that the whole event is televised live, could refuse to applaud a call for fair pay for women? But there they were, three Republican women during a cutaway shot at that very moment, playing the scolds, with one providing a pronounced Alito-like negatory head shake.
When the president proposed linking the minimum wage to the cost of living, as Mitt Romney had suggested during his losing presidential bid, Romney's running-mate Paul Ryan seemed trapped between a smirk and a frown and could not muster even a faux clap. And a proposal to create a commission to study voting rights, to be headed by the campaign lawyers for both Obama and Romney, got the same reaction.
Republicans even refused to clap for bridge repair. Surely, every congressional district has a bridge or two that needs fixing, so what is the political advantage in opposing safer bridges? As the president recognized, even though they refuse to be caught applauding anything he says, they still all show up for the ribbon cuttings in their own districts.
And when Marco Rubio's big moment came to provide the Republican response to the president's speech, the proclaimed new voice of the Republican Party performed more like the old Richard Nixon, with a bad case of the sweats and dry mouth.
Watching him lick his lips with increasing frequency, you knew he could not resist for long the temptation to dive for a gulp of cold water. And dive he did. Style points aside, it was quickly obvious that the speech he was given to read was not responsive to the speech the president had just given.
Much-touted national showcases often fall short of expectations, as Rubio's did. Both Bobby Jindal and Bill Clinton failed to impress when first chosen for the national spotlight, but they recovered. Maybe Rubio will, too.
Still, at the end of the day, Katy Perry looks pretty good.
Joseph Sabino Mistick, a lawyer, law professor and political analyst, lives in Squirrel Hill (SabinoMistick@aol.com).
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Garden Q&A: Firecracker vine OK for trellis?
- Two players ejected after Pirates, Brewers brawl
- Starkey: Penguins’ arrogance astounding
- Egg decorating turns to fight, charges in Brookline, police say
- Man dead in Beaver County brush fire
- Worshippers welcome Easter’s dawn in Pittsburgh’s North Side
- Matt Calvert’s goal in double OT evens series for Blue Jackets
- Police: McKees Rocks woman had child on board when she crashed after chase
- Draftees’ longevity key for NFL success
- Penguins’ Gibbons scores twice but leaves with apparent injury
- Officials identify Chartiers shooting victim as Wilkinsburg man