In the summer of 1894, 4,000 employees of the Pullman Co. went on a wildcat strike because their wages had been suddenly cut during an economic downturn and the company refused to drop the rent on their company housing to compensate for it.
President Grover Cleveland called in 12,000 federal troops. Things turned bloody; 37 strikers were killed.
The times were confusing. Other established unions did not support the strikers but the use of federal troops against the workers was a flash point. All involved in breaking the strike faced a political backlash. Within six days of the end of the strike, Cleveland and Congress found their solution — honoring workers generally by creating a new federal holiday called Labor Day.
Still, it was just a day. There had been bloody battles before and there would be many to come with little else to be expected in a system that treated workers like just so much raw material, expendable, to be had at the cheapest price possible.
Men worked 12-hour shifts seven days a week, swinging from daylight to night turn every week or two, which meant working 24 hours straight when making the turn. Deaths and disabling accidents were a daily occurrence in the mills and factories. A man who had been used up either left a widow or found the bottle.
In time, those battles at the factory gates and in the rail yards began to make a difference, providing a level playing field, a decent shot for all. Fair wages and benefits and safe working conditions became the norm. Children went to college, families moved into new homes and neighborhoods, and dreams came true.
Labor Day, once just a bone that was thrown to some broken and bloodied workers to placate them, finally began to stand for something. It became the day to celebrate American workers and their economic and social contributions to the nation, many of which we now take for granted.
Those two days off every week, often called the weekend, are a creation of organized labor. Paid vacations, holiday pay and sick days are, too. The minimum wage, overtime pay, and workers' and unemployment compensation have all been created through the efforts of unions.
The 40-hour workweek, the Occupational Safety and Health Act, Social Security, child labor laws and pensions are all the result of labor unions' hard work. And everybody benefits, anti-union workers as well — even ingrates.
As with all human institutions, success sometimes brought excess. But all the sneers of the anti-unionists cannot change the fact that labor built and protected the great American middle class. And as unionization has declined, who now has the bargaining power to do that?
Joseph Sabino Mistick, a lawyer, law professor and political analyst, lives in Squirrel Hill (SabinoMistick@aol.com).
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Wolf vetoes bill privatizing Pennsylvania’s liquor system
- Hurricanes owner rips Rutherford, Penguins
- Rossi: Wild Wednesday proves Steelers rule
- Starkey: Rutherford hits jackpot with Kessel
- Man who threatened to jump from bridge in custody
- Penguins notebook: Rutherford proves savvy in deal
- Bower Hill Road a source of concern
- New Kensington residents rally in support of 82-year-old robbery victim
- Indiana Twp. boy gets long-awaited liver transplant
- Beaver County woman finds man crouching in her bathroom, stabs him with sword
- Writings attributed to jailed Plum teacher dubbed evocative of stalker