For the past month, the media have presented reports addressing Gov. Corbett's proposed budget cuts. Conservatives have overwhelmingly agreed with the governor's plan to destroy public and higher education.
The main argument coming from the right seems to be that our teachers have miserably failed. If this is true, I must have imagined my public school experience.
When I made it to Thomas Jefferson High School in 2001, I started to understand how many great educators there truly were. Mr. Resnik was a young math teacher who helped me somehow pass geometry by teaching me sine, cosine and tangent functions on the bus ride home from a junior varsity baseball game.
Mr. McClain somehow got me interested in science, while Mrs. Loughran and Mrs. Barker introduced me to classic novels such as "1984" and "Fahrenheit 451." I have a love for reading to this day because of them.
Also, there was Coach Cherpak, who worked for nickels an hour but ironically taught me that there is so much more to life than football.
At California University of Pennsylvania, I was introduced to Dr. Marak, who taught me to question the world, and Mr. Rieck, who had an everlasting impact on my life. So I ask whether these are the failed educators I read about in the paper and hear about at the local tavern.
I wrote this letter to make the point that there are many great teachers out there and that they do have an everlasting positive effect upon our children's lives. For that is the main reason that I, 25 years old, am a public school teacher myself.
The writer teaches at Elizabeth Forward High School.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Not ‘too stupid’
- On right track
- Quarantine quandary
- EPA impoverishing seniors
- Back to ‘Mad Men’?
- ‘Change’ promise kept
- Invite God to school
- The sound of 2018
- Of tricksters & treaters
- Election in review II
- Election in review I