ShareThis Page

Space exploration ignored

| Tuesday, Nov. 29, 2016, 5:21 p.m.

Renowned physicist Stephen Hawking has confirmed what I have been saying to friends, family and students for years: We must look to the universe for ways to preserve our heritage and the human race. Hawking estimates that we have approximately 1,000 years to migrate to another planet in our solar system before the Earth is no longer habitable.

It is truly sad that since John F. Kennedy, no president, or presidential candidate for that matter, has placed a high priority on space exploration. Not once did panelists put forth questions to candidates in this campaign's debates or past debates about space exploration and specifically if they had a plan to save our civilization when our Earth spins out of existence.

We are so intent on protecting that which we have built and those who will carry on our heritage, yet we seem to be so very shortsighted by not placing more emphasis on space exploration, the only gateway to the survival of life as it now exists on Earth. If we continue to ignore the inevitable destruction of the Earth, those we love and all we have built will perish, and there will be no trace that we ever existed.

Matt Drozd


The writer, a Republican, is a former Allegheny County Council member.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.