ShareThis Page

Focus on PPS board races

| Wednesday, March 15, 2017, 9:00 p.m.

Candidates for mayor, Pittsburgh City Council and Allegheny County Council were named in the article “It's official: It's a 3-candidate race for Pittsburgh mayor,” but the candidates for the Pittsburgh Public Schools board, which oversees a budget of $594.4 million ($55 million larger than the City of Pittsburgh's), were not.

They are Sylvia Wilson, Sala Udin, James Myers Jr., Terry Kennedy, Ghadah Makoshi, Cynthia Falls, Joseph Conrad Kearfott Burns, Carolyn Klug and Veronica Edwards.

The board makes policy that guides the education of 24,000 students, sets the work rules and pay for over 3,000 teachers and staff, oversees and hires the superintendent and his administration, and sets property and income taxes for city residents. Yet, too often, candidates get scant attention and scrutiny from the media and community. This leads to gaps in voting, with a drop-off of anywhere between 5 percent and 20 percent of voters who go to the polls but make no selection for school board.

A+ Schools wants to change this information gap. Along with coalition partners, we are asking the public to “Vote School Board First.” Starting soon, voters will be able to go to to learn more about the candidates and their role in shaping the future of our region.

We hope the Tribune-Review will dedicate coverage to better understanding the volunteers who are running for school board, and what their plans are for improving Pittsburgh students' quality of education.

James Fogarty


The writer is executive director of A+ Schools.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.