ShareThis Page

Arming teachers? II

| Saturday, Nov. 4, 2017, 9:00 p.m.

Pennsylvania Senate Bill 383, currently under consideration, would allow teachers to have firearms in schools ( “Teachers with guns? Senate Bill 383 gives OK in Pa.” ). This is absurd.

In Westmoreland County's most notable incident, student Alex Hribal's knifing of peers at Franklin Regional High School, armed teachers would have been useless. Hallways were a melee of students. No one, including the best-trained police officers, would dare to have fired into that crowd.

SB 383 also presents other problems. A gun is only useful if it's loaded. Where, in a first-grade classroom, for instance, would a loaded firearm be safely stored? If it were stored unloaded, how would the teacher-guard access ammunition quickly and in the minutes bill supporters claim are so essential to school protection? When police arrive, how will they know which armed persons are the “good guys”?

SB383 creates an illusion of safety when it actually creates much potential for tragedy.

Helen Sitler

Ligonier

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.