ShareThis Page

Penn Vet & food supply

| Monday, June 19, 2017, 9:00 p.m.

Many Pennsylvanians trust their beloved pets to the care of their veterinarian because they know veterinarians provide compassionate care for companion animals. However, few Pennsylvanians are aware of the role veterinarians play in protecting the food supply.

Penn Vet, the only school of veterinary medicine in Pennsylvania, has received funding from the state until the most recent budget proposal. This funding is critical to protecting both public health and Pennsylvania's food supply. Consider:

• Penn Vet has both the personnel and facilities to fight re-emerging threats such as rabies. There is no other facility in the state with the diagnostics capable of a timely rabies assessment, as well as the ability to pursue other diagnostics in the event of a negative result.

• Penn Vet's Swine Center collects data on where swine viruses occur, helping farmers and truckers see where disease is present to prevent its spread. The program maintains a map covering 1.29 million hogs in the state and has resulted in a 30-percent reduction in the number of pigs in the program with viruses.

• During the last budget impasse, Penn Vet conducted 70,000 tests for avian influenza without payment at a time when the disease was causing billions of dollars in losses in the Midwest.

• Penn Vet's role in developing an egg quality assurance program in Pennsylvania results in 99.99 percent of Pennsylvania eggs making it to market without salmonella.

Let's take the steps to ensure Pennsylvania has a safe food supply by restoring funding for Penn Vet.

Dr. Joan C. Hendricks

Philadelphia

The writer is the Gilbert S. Kahn Dean of Veterinary Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.