ShareThis Page

Letter to the editor: Tax bill will hurt charities, givers

| Wednesday, Dec. 6, 2017, 9:00 p.m.

Charitable organizations and their donors undoubtedly breathed a sigh of relief upon learning that the tax proposals which recently passed both the House and Senate preserved the charitable contribution deduction. A closer look at both versions, along with some simple math, however, reveals quite another story.

With the standard deduction almost doubled, property tax and mortgage interest capped, deductions for state and local income and sales taxes eliminated, and deductions for medical expenses preserved only in the Senate version, millions of Americans now will find it impossible to surpass the threshold necessary for filing Schedule A. Without Schedule A, they will receive no tax deduction for any charitable contributions they may have made.

While some individuals will continue to make contributions without the benefit of a tax deduction, many others — especially those paying even higher taxes — will think twice before opening their wallet or checkbook the next time a natural disaster strikes or a letter requesting a charitable donation arrives.

In addition, almost doubling the standard deduction is not the generous “gift” if appears either because the personal exemption loss offsets the standard deduction increase by 86.25 percent.

In the end, both charitable organizations and the middle class will end up losers if this smoke and mirrors illusion becomes law.

Susan L. Gero

Leechburg

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.