ShareThis Page
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Bible & women's dress

| Monday, Jan. 15, 2018, 9:00 p.m.

Bible & women's dress

I must respond to Ray Moran's letter “Bare skin & assault” . When the Bible is quoted as a guideline as to how women “should” dress, I am reminded of the Taliban and other religions that use their holy books to control how women dress and behave.

The verse Moran quoted says “women should adorn themselves in respectable apparel, with modesty and self-control.” Who will determine what is respectable attire? That verse was written 2,000 years ago, so is that the attire you suggest women should be wearing? Are we to set up a “morals police,” as other countries have as a way to control people?

As far as “self-control,” perhaps that should be put on the men who lack it. By pointing a finger at women's dress you are saying the man is not responsible for his behavior or lack of self-control — and putting the blame on the victim. Perhaps when a man finds himself in a situation where his “self-control” is lacking, he should walk away and not let his animal behaviors rule him.

The sexual harassment cases in the news are about power, not clothing — men feeling they are so powerful they no longer need to ask or respect but take.

Even in countries that control women's attire, where women have their bodies completely covered, there is still rape and harassment. And, no surprise, the man's lack of control is still blamed on the woman and she is punished.

Terral Schneider

Greensburg

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me