ShareThis Page
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Graham worked for good

| Saturday, March 10, 2018, 9:00 p.m.

George F. Will's elitism is, once again, showing ( “Billy Graham, neither prophet nor theologian, leaves mixed legacy” ).

Regardless of a person's religious philosophy, or lack thereof, religion has played a major role in the maintenance of a civilized society. Of course, we experience some negative effects of the radical terrorists who rationalize their evil behavior in the name of religion. But the progenitors of our modern organized religions were, in nearly all instances, drivers of the moral and ethical behavior of civilization. Graham, in his life work, used the driving force of religious philosophy in his quest to leave the world a better place.

I was fortunate enough, during my college days, to have met Marcus Bach, a student of the religions of the world, a professor at the University of Iowa and, among his other talents and abilities, a prolific author of 27 books. Bach summed up his life study of many of the religions of the world with the simple statement that “All roads that lead to God are good.” Perhaps Will should have just left it at that.

Joseph G. Cremonese

Hempfield

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me