ShareThis Page
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Pa. must make school funding a priority

| Monday, May 14, 2018, 9:00 p.m.

The article “29 New Ken-Arnold teachers on furlough list” highlights the harm inadequate state funding inflicts on students and communities. Currently, Pennsylvania ranks 47th in the nation in state share for public schools.

If the state would fully fund the fair funding formula for education that was enacted two years ago, New Kensington-Arnold would receive an additional $8,535,924 in state funding each year. If the state paid its fair share of school funding, the district would not be furloughing teachers and increasing property taxes year after year. Instead, the district would be educating children in schools with class sizes small enough for students to receive personal attention, a full range of courses from science to music and art, up-to-date books and technology, guidance counselors to help students with their career decisions, and so much more.

It's time for the Pennsylvania Legislature to make adequate funding for public schools a top priority in the 2018-19 budget and moving forward. Every year that passes without fixing the state's school funding means thousands more children will not get the educational opportunities they need to reach their potential.

Susan Spicka

Philadelphia

The writer is executive director of Education Voters of PA ( www.educationvoterspa.org ). She will moderate a discussion about state funding for public education in Westmoreland County at 7 p.m. May 17 at the Westmoreland Intermediate Unit.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me