ShareThis Page
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: New Franklin Regional school is a bad idea

| Saturday, June 9, 2018, 6:23 p.m.

We were startled one recent evening when our doorbell rang at 9:30. I was surprised to see the former mayor of Murrysville, Joyce Somers, who was circulating a petition against the Franklin Regional School District's proposed building project. That was impressive, and we should consider why a well-informed former elected official would feel so strongly about an issue to do such a thing. Such actions should not be taken lightly.

My experience representing this area in the Pennsylvania Legislature gave me good insight into why this is a really bad idea. I do not fault the school directors, as theirs is a thankless, unpaid job. I thank them for their service. Unfortunately, they are influenced by school administrators who control what is presented to them.

A while back I was asked to serve on an advisory committee for the school district. I quickly discovered that the only advice was one way and it wasn't coming from me. Officials had a preconceived outcome and rejected anything that didn't agree with it.

That is why I am asking any school director who can see the folly in the current course of events to take a courageous stand and fight for the people.

Lee C. Taddonio

Murrysville

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me