Over the past four years, the Fleet Reserve Association (FRA), Steel City Branch 253, has sponsored veterans' workshops throughout Fayette County. The main purpose of these workshops was to inform the veterans on what benefits and services were available to them and their dependents and to convince Veterans Affairs (VA) that Fayette County needed a VA Community Based Outpatient Clinic (CBOC).
These same veterans conducted a letter-writing campaign to their representatives in Harrisburg and Washington, D.C., regarding a CBOC. It was through their efforts that the VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System announced it will be opening a primary care center for veterans in Uniontown.
On behalf of the FRA, Steel City Branch 253, I would like to thank all the veterans who attended the veterans' workshops and wrote to their representatives, especially the following individuals and their organizations: Victor Kozares, past commander United War Veterans of Uniontown; Donald Burd, past commander United Veterans Association of Fayette County; Pat Britt, commander AMVETS Post 103; Kenneth Grimm, representing Catholic War Veterans Post 1669; Dan Martin, commandant Marine Corps League; John Kenes, commander Military Order of the Purple Heart; Frank Voytek, commander Vietnam Veterans Inc.; and Robert Hixson Jr., VA director of Fayette County.
With our coordinated efforts, we will continue to protect and improve the hard-earned benefits of our veterans, reservists and National Guard personnel. If, we, as veterans, don't support our troops and fellow veterans, how can we expect others to help?
J. R. Smith,
Fleet Reserve Association
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Voters capable
- Progress not reflected
- Scapegoating easy; solutions not
- Blame misdirected
- Steel at stake, too
- Pedro must go
- Reverse red-kettle ban I
- Oberdorf firing
- Reverse red-kettle ban II
- Duty to disclose
- Good riddance