ShareThis Page

Historical insight

| Wednesday, July 11, 2001

I thank the Trib for its editorial pages on Independence Day. While I always find these pages well thought out and enlightening, this one was especially so. The combination of historical documentation and modern thought on that history put things in perspective.

It is disconcerting to note how little some of our next generation know about their heritage and how the focus of our republic has changed over the past 225 years, but I am not without hope. If one in four teen-agers doesn't know from which country we declared independence or that the Declaration was signed in Philadelphia on July 4, 1776 (the July 3 edition carried a story on the results of a Colonial Williamsburg Foundation history survey), that means that three in four teen-agers do have at least some understanding.

I am proud to say that my kids have that knowledge and understanding. While their mom and I can take some of the credit for that, I have to give credit to their teachers at Brentwood High School. My son had a part in this year's musical production - '1776' - and he learned a great deal about this nation's founding, both from the play itself and from the director.

As a Boy Scout leader, I have had the privilege of working with several young men who had more than a passing understanding of freedom and liberty as they entered into adulthood. I am optimistic about the upcoming generation.

As long as we adults teach our kids about freedom and the responsibility that goes with it, I think that America will endure.

Thanks again for the July 4 editorial pages!

Mike Henninger

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.