UPMC neglects its own
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Wednesday, Oct. 3, 2012, 10:55 p.m.
I am a nine-year UPMC employee and I read in the news story “UPMC defends tax-exempt status” (Sept. 19 and TribLIVE.com) that UPMC is spending thousands of dollars to run a marketing campaign about where all its money goes.
I don't know where it spends its hundreds of millions of dollars in profit, but I do know that if I didn't pick up overtime, I would make well under $1,000 a month.
Even though I pay for UPMC health care, I get more bills than I can afford to pay. I am thousands of dollars in debt to my own employer.
I would love to have good credit, but each month I have to choose among paying for housing, health care and food. I am not ashamed to say that I have to visit the food bank sometimes and co-workers have had to take out loans to pay for lights. That's why we're forming a union.
Where does all of UPMC's money go? I don't know. But how can I work 50 hours a week for a $10 billion enterprise and still be poor? If UPMC wants people to know that it invests in the community, how about investing with the community members who work for it?
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Bloomberg & coal
- Knives vs. guns I
- Valley musical superb
- Knives vs. guns II
- In tragedy’s wake II
- Stabbings reveal heroics
- Resurrection? Yes, really
- The Obama Doctrine I wonder …
- Tragedy sensationalized
- Consequences in space
- Tragedy’s ramifications II