Regarding “A Page of Books: Publishing from the inside” (Sept. 30 and TribLIVE.com): How can Jed Lyons, Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group president and CEO, criticize self-publishing while still declaring his love of Pennsylvania history?
Pittsburgh, in particular, has had so much of its life captured in self-published works of the city's colorful locals. From Barbara S. Burstin's “Steel City Jews: A History of Pittsburgh and its Jewish Community, 1840-1915” to “Building a Better Robot” (a tribute to Pittsburgh-area punk-rock site the Mr. Roboto Project), self-publishing can be thanked for giving us numerous works that document the diversity of the Keystone State.
FriesenPress, the self-publishing company I work for, was lucky enough to partner with Helen Steudler Young for publication of her “New Ways to Enjoy Lancaster County Pennsylvania Cooking.” What people eat is one of the first things historians look at when trying to understand past cultures. Although not ostensibly a history book, Helen's collection of recipes does the important job of documenting Lancaster County cuisine along Pennsylvania's larger culinary continuum.
Without self-publishing, the stories told by the authors mentioned above would be no more than whispers in the wind. Lyons is concerned about self-publishing. The bigger concern is how much of our history is being lost because traditional publishers don't think it's marketable.
Victoria, British Columbia
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Good riddance
- Not taxpayers’ responsibility
- Reverse red-kettle ban I
- ‘Coyote Capitalism’
- Leaders unaccountable
- Incomprehensible? That’s Obama
- Idea for casino
- Legalize all
- Reverse red-kettle ban II
- Punishment pushback II
- Punishment pushback I