Exceptional no more II
The American Experiment is dead. The citizens of the country killed it at the voting booth.
It died under the boot of the entitlement mentality and the idea that there is a free lunch out there somewhere.
It died in the need of its citizens to be relieved of personal accountability and responsibility; essentially, to be relieved of the burden of freedom.
It died in the desire of its citizens not to be above, not to be exceptional, but to be on par with other socialist countries.
It died because the citizens chose not to resist the transformation from capitalism to socialism.
It died because the citizens rejected a life of liberty, free will, responsibility, accountability and the idea that the government is the servant of the people.
It died because the citizens voted in favor of certainty, security, government as a father figure and the handout.
One day in the future, when America is dominated by other countries, when the ruling-class politicians and government workers are the only folks with money, responsible Americans will sit back dumbfounded and wonder how it all went so wrong.
The irresponsible ones will sit content; they no longer need to defend America's greatness, her exceptionalism.
Carl A. Flecker Jr.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Pedro must go
- Steel at stake, too
- Duty to disclose
- Oberdorf firing
- Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances
- Practicing preaching?
- Solution, not problem
- The Holder problem
- Reverse red-kettle ban II
- ‘Coyote Capitalism’
- Legalize all