Inverted sign of the times
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Monday, Dec. 3, 2012, 8:51 p.m.
In his Nov. 14 letter, “No reason to disrespect the flag,” W. John Stanoski stated that he is appalled by individuals and businesses flying the American flag upside down.
I served in the active-duty military for 22 years and support this form of expression.
According to U.S. Flag Code, the inverted flag signifies “dire distress in instances of extreme danger to life or property” and doesn't provide any penalty for displaying it this way. The notion that folks are doing this because they fear their “bottom line will suffer” makes about as much sense as a screen door in a submarine.
The upside-down flag is an appropriate statement because the country is in distress:
• The economy is an ongoing train wreck.
• The Obama administration functions without regard for the Constitution.
• It has weakened national security and damaged the military, our foreign policy is a joke and our borders are not secure.
• We now face the biggest tax increase in history.
Over the years, liberals have burned the flag or otherwise defiled it. Kudos to everyone exercising their First Amendment rights by simply inverting it.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Slots & property taxes
- Medicaid’s future
- Harmar needs better enforcement
- Math in common?
- Drought answer?
- Beneficial, irreplaceable
- Putin’s actions I
- What competition?
- Obstacles to hiring
- Sovereignty trampled
- Apollo-Ridge excellence