Govt. must live within means
Anybody living in a home has to be responsible for prudently managing monetary affairs. They must have the wherewithal to budget money properly, learn to control costs, keep spending in check and make appropriate sacrifices when necessary.
There are those, however, who feel otherwise. Many elected city officials, in their quest to cover shortfalls in annual budgets, always have their hands out for cash in the form of property tax increases, in addition to business entities, such as water, sewage, gas, electric, telephone and cable companies, that are continually wanting more from us.
Doesn't anybody realize that many individuals are on fixed incomes or do not have the extra money to give? Their personal savings have rapidly dwindled as a result of what has been happening.
There are many people who do not get wage increases. And to those who are, indeed, fortunate enough to get an annual salary hike, on a percentage basis, it most certainly is not adequate to cover the added expenses of what everybody else wants or expects.
The recent Saxonburg property tax increase of over 20 percent is a prime example. That was an extremely ridiculous increase to impose. Many people are going to be hurt by that. This shifting of responsibility (or should I say fiscal irresponsibility) onto taxpayers is out of control and has been for a long time.
If we, as citizens, are required to live within our means, why can't these people who constantly want more of our hard-earned money also do the same?
Robin L. Rosewicz
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- An Obama clone
- Good ‘friends,’ good food
- U.S. Steel worthy of grant
- White House not playing to win
- Write-in alternative
- Hospital’s hero & more
- Better in long run
- Farewell, my Springdale
- Unworthy of high office
- Not clean enough
- Working hard in fast food