Studying aging & stress
Studying aging & stress
Thank you for publishing Rachel Weaver's news story “Western Pa. agencies take on all aspects of aging” (Nov. 15 and TribLIVE.com). The story highlights not only the many stressors that often accompany aging and caregiving, but also the importance of identifying sources of support.
We know stress can have strong negative effects on both physical and emotional health. If not addressed early, stress can become overwhelming and may lead to depression.
Practical supports like the aide and caregiver support services discussed in the story are vital. Personal and social supports are important as well.
I am a project coordinator for a set of studies that the University of Pittsburgh is conducting, called iMANAGE (Independence, Maintaining Activities No matter what AGE) studies, to learn more about effective ways for adults over age 60 to manage stress. Two groups of older adults that we are focusing on are those who are receiving in-home services such as housecleaning, personal care or home-delivered meals, and those who are experiencing some mild memory changes and have a friend or family member who can participate with them.
Our goal is to find ways to empower older adults to take control of stress so they can enjoy many more happy, healthy years of independent living. For more information about the iMANAGE studies, visit imanagestress.org or call 412-246-6006.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- EPA not the problem
- Law applies to drillers, too
- Trophy shot trumps learning
- Speak up on illegals
- Quarantine quandary
- Voting insanity
- No new stadium for Kiski
- The real big spenders
- Can’t go it alone
- Gruber, then & now I
- Honoring service I