Share This Page

Squandering change

| Tuesday, Dec. 4, 2012, 8:52 p.m.

In the recent election, we squandered our opportunity for real change and opted instead for another four years of Barack Obama. His vow to work with Congress is just another empty promise that he will never keep.

We saw how he worked with Republicans while crafting ObamaCare. Who would expect him to change now?

Scoundrel Bill Clinton was impeached for lying to a grand jury under oath.

Contrast that with the numerous times President Obama has bypassed Congress, trashed our Constitution, ruled by “executive order” and refused to enforce our laws. In addition, he has the gun-running “Fast and Furious” and Benghazi cover-ups to explain.

Why does Clinton get impeached and Obama gets a pass?

My guess is politicians are afraid of the “race card.” They pretend not to notice and just overlook Obama's misdeeds.

Obama will never resign, but if he were impeached and removed from office, Joe Biden would become president. Gasp! Just the thought is blood curdling.

Another winner in this election was Bob Casey, a man who spent six years in Washington and accomplished nothing. Bob says he needs six more years to finish the job.

As in the past, the big loser was the military. Some servicemen and women who voted by absentee ballot did not have their votes counted because the ballots arrived late.

This is disgraceful. If anyone has a right to vote and have that vote counted, it's those who risk their lives to defend our country.

If the Postal Service can't deliver these ballots on time, let's find someone who can.

Rudy Gagliardi

Arnold

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.