The new religious persecution
I have a great deal of respect for the people of Connellsville and the Connellsville area for standing up for the rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution.
The Constitution states that we have freedom of religion, not freedom from religion. Historically, certain religious groups have been persecuted in many ways by various groups, even by other religious groups. They were tortured, ostracized and imprisoned for having a particular point of view. They could not celebrate their beliefs in their own particular way.
Laws were often made to force them to give up their way of thinking. They came to America for the freedom to practice their religion. The writers of the Constitution remembered this struggle and wrote a protection into this document.
Now we have a group that, by Webster's definition, may be defined as a religious group, expressing its philosophy in school texts and political action. In recent years this group has continued to advance its beliefs by attempting to “legally” squash any opposition.
Hopefully this persecution will be seen for what it is. And the protectors of religious rights established in our Constitution will stop bending to the malicious attacks on this American right. The gift given to the school district, a Ten Commandments monument, was not an imposition on anyone's belief any more than a Catholic hospital interacting with the government to serve the needs of people.
Considering all the problems this country and world are having, it is a shame any group would want to tear down that which would promote positive goals.
Edwin T. Zylka
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.