Published: Saturday, Dec. 8, 2012, 9:00 p.m.
Regarding The Associated Press news story “1st same-sex wedding held at West Point chapel” (Dec. 2 and TribLIVE.com) about a ceremony at the Cadet Chapel: I was surprised to read in the very last paragraph that a same-sex wedding was held the previous weekend at another landmark on West Point's campus, the Old Cadet Chapel.
Was it newsworthy that yet another gay wedding was held at West Point? Or was it that the AP, the Trib and other media outlets — under the pretext of the Cadet Chapel wedding — once again cozied up to the gay lobby in its relentless efforts to establish gay marriage as a new norm?
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Choosing judges I
- Choosing judges II
- Prevailing wage downsides I
- Lies and disrespect I taught …
- Prevailing wage downsides II
- Privatization disastrous
- Forcing their beliefs
- Valid comparison?
- Hero at rest
- Nukes, not hoops