Not gun's fault
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Sunday, Dec. 9, 2012, 8:54 p.m.
Not gun's fault
We've all heard of the tragic murder-suicide involving a Kansas City Chiefs player. I offer condolences and prayers to all affected. Naturally, it was a headline on all of that weekend's NFL coverage, including a halftime “commentary” by NBC's Bob Costas, who quoted a column by a Kansas City writer, the theme of which was that “gun control laws” caused the tragedy. Costas said, “If Jovan Belcher didn't possess a gun, he and Kasandra Perkins would both be alive today.”
I must disagree vehemently. Football is a violent game played by violent men, and Belcher, like numerous college and NFL players, might have instead chosen to beat his girlfriend.
Consider the case of Brianna Davis, 30, of Independence, Mo. She died in a car crash on the Friday of that same weekend in Kansas City. Costas would have you believe that if Davis' companion did not have access to that car, she would still be alive. Actually, the driver, not the car, caused her death, and Belcher, not the gun, killed his girlfriend.
Millions of Americans own guns and cars, use them responsibly and enjoy healthy relationships.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- ‘We the people’ are veterans
- Corbett’s choice
- Invest in pre-K
- Islam & women
- Slots & property taxes
- Medicaid’s future
- Lebo’s coyotes
- Beneficial, irreplaceable
- Putin’s actions I
- Drought answer?
- Funding priorities questioned