Give lawmakers credit
As noted in Colin McNickle's column “It's time to lead, Governor” (Dec. 2 and TribLIVE.com), big-ticket items — pension reform, transportation infrastructure funding, etc. — that will require bold leadership remain to be addressed by the General Assembly in the new year.
However, the swipe at legislative leaders' performance unfairly ignored some significant public-policy initiatives enacted over the past two years that will help boost economic/job growth in the commonwealth.
A sweeping unemployment compensation reform law addresses a multibillion-dollar debt, saves employers hundreds of millions of dollars and begins to restore the system to its safety-net intent. Tax reforms will help create a more competitive/efficient business tax climate. The decade-long fight for joint and several liability reform was realized, bringing Pennsylvania's unbalanced, unpredictable legal system more in line with competitor states.
A bipartisan, performance-based manufacturing tax credit gives Pennsylvania a leg up in securing a proposed petrochemical facility in Western Pennsylvania, a catalyst for growing this promising industry, generating potentially thousands of jobs. And a commitment to responsible government spending/budgeting is enabling the state to get its fiscal house in order.
Heavy lifting remains. But after eight years of defending against anti-jobs policies, progress is being realized, all of which will benefit the commonwealth, job creators and residents for the long term. For that, elected officials deserve credit.
The writer is president of the Pennsylvania Chamber of Business and Industry (pachamber.org).
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Reverse red-kettle ban I
- Good riddance
- Reverse red-kettle ban II
- Not taxpayers’ responsibility
- Punishment pushback I
- Incomprehensible? That’s Obama
- Don’t blame bus drivers II
- Punishment pushback II
- No ground troops
- Legalize all
- Leaders unaccountable