ShareThis Page

Parking discrimination

| Thursday, Jan. 3, 2013, 9:01 p.m.

Parking discrimination

Pittsburgh's new parking meter system, requiring that license-plate numbers be entered to pay, is discriminatory against some of the population and intrusive on everyone's personal liberties.

First, about 10 percent of the population in English-speaking countries is dyslexic. If an individual gets a parking ticket for inverting or not remembering the correct letters or numbers, does that person have to go to court to have the fine removed? That individual has to take time off to attend court or pay the fine. What is wrong with paying for a parking receipt and putting it in your vehicle's window?

Second, the government, even more so, will have the ability to track your movements. That soon might be expanded to track you up to 10 p.m. It is bad enough that the government keeps tabs on your cellphone calls; to expand this to parking is even more prying into our private lives.

This is going to force more people to go to places that have parking spaces that are unregulated. If the 10 p.m. law takes effect, it will kill businesses, theater venues and nightlife Downtown and in the neighborhoods.

David Manthei


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.