By The Tribune-Review
Published: Friday, Dec. 28, 2012, 8:58 p.m.
I am pleased that the Maxwell Football Club has chosen to honor the Nittany Lion senior football players with its Spirit Award.
Most of the media figured this team would be lucky to win three or four games at best. Most are now treating this eight-win season as a miracle of biblical proportions.
Ron Jaworski, Maxwell Club president, said he was astonished by the performances of these Nittany Lions. Many Penn State alumni, like me, were not the least bit surprised.
Why, might you ask?
These players were recruited and coached by Joseph Paterno — the same man who consistently turned out similar young men each year.
Ironically, this is the same man whose name was removed from the Maxwell Coach of the Year Award in November 2011. Much like the Big Ten, the Maxwell Club rushed to judgment without the benefit of due process.
During the awards ceremony, I believe Paterno should be given some credit for this team's amazing performance.
How could the Maxwell Club best honor these Nittany Lions on March 1? Announce that Paterno's name is being rightfully restored to its Coach of the Year Award.
Thomas M. Bradley
The writer is not Penn State football's former longtime defensive coordinator.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Obama & Reaganomics II
- Obama & Reaganomics I
- Shredded Wheat & ‘Low T’
- Our nation’s testing obsession
- Math in common?
- Putin’s actions I
- Putin’s actions II