Perversion of God's design II
Regarding the column “Gay marriage” by C.S. Pearce: I don't care who you are or what your credentials are. The Webster's (1979) definition of marriage is “the mutual relation of husband and wife. The institution whereby men and women are joined in a special kind of social and legal dependence for the purpose of founding and maintaining a family.”
This simply cannot happen with two people of the same sex because marriage involves sex between two opposite but equal-in-the-sight-of-God people!
Each partner brings something special and unique to the marriage that you just cannot get with two people of the same sex.
Two people of the same sex may wish to confer benefits to their partner, etc. There could be a legal contract. Call it something else, but don't call it marriage!
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Russia, not Rice
- Positive & healthy ...
- Goodell’s ‘pick-six’
- Ferguson & contradictions
- Thanks for the coverage
- ... Or free-riding fad?
- More answers, please
- Sticker shock
- Hiring in Westmoreland II
- Blame judges
- Hiring in Westmoreland I