Larger text
Smaller text
Perversion of God’s design II
Daily Photo Galleries
By Tribune-Review
Published: Thursday, December 13, 2012, 8:57 p.m.
Updated: Tuesday, February 19, 2013
Regarding the column “Gay marriage” by C.S. Pearce: I don't care who you are or what your credentials are. The Webster's (1979) definition of marriage is “the mutual relation of husband and wife. The institution whereby men and women are joined in a special kind of social and legal dependence for the purpose of founding and maintaining a family.”
This simply cannot happen with two people of the same sex because marriage involves sex between two opposite but equal-in-the-sight-of-God people!
Each partner brings something special and unique to the marriage that you just cannot get with two people of the same sex.
Two people of the same sex may wish to confer benefits to their partner, etc. There could be a legal contract. Call it something else, but don't call it marriage!
Yvonne Darville
Cranberry
Most-Read Letters
- Another form of tyranny
- More for transportation
- A-R school security
- Try to walk in his shoes
- Already influenced
- Top pick: Class act
- Really dragging us down I
- Really dragging us down II
- Puzzling priority
- Faithful fan at 92
- Judicial ‘favor’-itism?
You must be signed in to add comments
To comment, click the Sign in or sign up at the very top of this page.
"... hereby men and women are joined in a special kind of social and legal dependence". Hmmm. I guess it no longer just one man and one woman, even in the Book of Webster. By the way, is Webster in the Old or New Testament?
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.
