| Opinion/The Review

Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Benghazi questions linger

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or

Daily Photo Galleries

Letter to the Editor
Thursday, Dec. 27, 2012, 9:03 p.m.

I found the news story “Jihad in Libya: A matter of economic uncertainty, some say” (Dec. 9 and unfulfilling in completeness. It alludes to why the ambassador was in Benghazi. The national media talk about U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice and the White House misleading the public about the cause of the ambassador's death prior to the election. Both of these issues have great importance.

The most important question the story and the national press have avoided like the plague is: Who allowed these four Americans to die and why? With armed forces on standby and less than one hour away, we did nothing. Yet a member of the armed services recently died rescuing an American doctor overseas.

The president and his staff broke faith with the American armed services by blatantly allowing these four Americans to die. We unabashedly expect our men and women to answer the call to arms. They won't know whether or not they will be helped when placed in harm's way by our country.

Mr. President and Congress, what are you going to do when there is an executive order or declaration of war given and uniformed members of the armed services don't answer the call because you broke faith?

Ray Borkoski

Ford City

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.



Show commenting policy

Most-Read Letters

  1. WQED beyond repair?
  2. Data misrepresented
  3. ‘Normal’ pitfalls
  4. Tick carriers
  5. The Vick ‘rub’
  6. The budget impasse