Losing our freedoms
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Friday, Dec. 28, 2012, 8:58 p.m.
Losing our freedoms
What makes this nation different has been its respect for personal freedoms and property rights. We've been a magnet for able and motivated people, their accomplishments unfettered by histories of class and privilege. The resulting economic force predominated.
Generations have come and prospered, believing accomplishments were theirs to obtain and hold. Few achieved without hard work and tenacity. Most gleaned a sense of community responsibility and contributed to the welfare of others.
Americans are unparalleled for their charity. This flows from our individual freedom to choose.
Over the last century, the federal government has abridged the basic premise with a thousand cuts. To meet changing times, it argues, we must forfeit our fundamental beliefs and join the decay of other failed societies.
Confiscating wealth is a symbolic gesture to the growing population contributing nothing to the nation. It deprives our youth of the incentive to innovate and be exceptional. It moves wealth and business elsewhere. It cannot offset any meaningful part of our national debt.
Our representatives have knowingly turned us against each other. The unsustainable debt they have underwritten is incomprehensibly large. Unchallenged, this will be the legacy of poverty we leave our children.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Fix icy hazard on Rt. 66
- Lebo’s coyotes
- Saved her life
- Drought answer?
- Beneficial, irreplaceable
- What competition?
- Sovereignty trampled
- Cuts worsen hunger
- Not reviled abroad
- Slavish media
- Putin for Prez II