Guns aren't 'evil'
Regarding the calls for new gun-control laws from various media outlets: Evil was present at the beginning of time, will be present at the end of days, and is all around us. Evil cannot be banned, outlawed or legislated away. Evil cannot be eliminated any more than love can be eliminated. Evil will always find a way to further its agenda, whether with guns, knives, bombs, boxcutters or airliners.
There is a constant struggle between two opposing forces. Evil must be fought against each and every day, and on the best of days, we fight to a draw. Fight we must, but we cannot fight evil with peace and love. Evil does not recognize peace and love, which it abhors; it looks to destroy peace and love.
We must fight evil with overwhelming force, and to do that, we must have the right tools. Evil fights dirty and is cowardly. It does not attack military posts and police stations; it attacks places where people are unarmed and helpless.
Newtown, Conn., teacher Victoria Soto used her body to shield her students; colleague Dawn Hochsprung charged evil unarmed; the heroes of Flight 93 used a service cart in the aisle to fight back. I pray evil never visits me or my loved ones, but if that situation ever presents itself, I want the playing field to be level.
I will fight back with the weapons I legally, proudly and unashamedly possess. Guns are not evil. They are simply implements to use in the fight against people bound and determined to further evil.
James E. Penton
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Russia, not Rice
- Positive & healthy ...
- Ferguson & contradictions
- More answers, please
- ... Or free-riding fad?
- Thanks for the coverage
- Goodell’s ‘pick-six’
- Sticker shock
- Blame judges
- Hiring in Westmoreland II
- Hiring in Westmoreland I