Follow the money
Follow the money
There is a premise in all the discussions in Washington that we should not accept: The assumption that everything Washington spends money on has a legitimate purpose. Is there anyone who really believes that? I don't even think the politicians believe that.
So, let's start with immediate (not over 10 years) spending cuts, and not just the “easy targets,” such as defense and entitlements. I am sure that if you gave the list of federal expenditures to any adult in this country who manages a household budget, that person could cut out a lot without even touching these things — probably enough that we could get along without tax increases and maybe even pay off some of the debt that politicians have put on our children.
It won't happen, however, because all the beneficiaries of those unnecessary expenses give lots of money to politicians' campaigns, while our military and those who need our help do not.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- An Obama clone
- Farewell, my Springdale
- Hospital’s hero & more
- U.S. Steel worthy of grant
- Good ‘friends,’ good food
- Better in long run
- White House not playing to win
- Unworthy of high office
- Write-in alternative
- Not clean enough
- Thanks for nothing