TribLIVE

| Opinion/The Review

 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Empty NRA criticism

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or cmcnickle@tribweb.com).

Daily Photo Galleries

Letter to the Editor
Wednesday, Jan. 2, 2013, 8:58 p.m.
 

After watching the talking heads asking “Why do we need assault rifles?” — it should be obvious. I will use David Gregory of “Meet the Press” badgering NRA CEO Wayne LaPierre as an example.

Mr. LaPierre was trying to use common sense in explaining that gun-free zones are an invitation for psychopaths to prey on schoolchildren and that a trained armed officer is the best deterrent for stopping these evil people. But politicians like Charles Schumer and Dianne Feinstein piled on, citing “gun control” as the only alternative. Their motives are strictly political. They know armed people are a threat to their goal of total government control.

The aforementioned senators were part and parcel to the violation of our Posse Comitatus Act along with Attorney General Janet Reno when law enforcement used “armored vehicles” to incinerate 80 Branch Davidians in Waco, Texas, on April 19, 1993. Prior to that, three people were killed in August 1992 at Ruby Ridge, Idaho, for being white separatists. Both accounts are called “tyranny” — and that is why we as citizens need to be armed.

By the way, no citizen owns an “assault rifle.” That is just a term to scare the uninformed into agreeing with the erosion of the U.S. Constitution.

President Obama just won a second term largely by using class envy to continue to divide and conquer this nation. He promised the “have-nots” the wealth of the “haves,” knowing he can influence popular opinions and votes that way. Roughly half of the population does not care about trading “liberty” for security. Hence, they unwittingly become enablers to destroy the Constitution.

The beauty of the Second Amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it.

D.R. Lewis

Chicora

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Letters

  1. Cops, stars shine
  2. Hike tobacco tax
  3. Hillary running hearing?
  4. Trump & free speech
  5. Coal’s health hazards
  6. ATI abandoned its own