Some snow job I
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Monday, Dec. 31, 2012, 9:01 p.m.
Apparently the Dec. 26 snowstorm caught those responsible for clearing the streets by surprise. Funny, that always seems to happen.
The fine people at the National Weather Service told us several days before that it was coming. Yet, at 2 p.m., my commute from Clairton to Mt. Oliver was a sheer horror.
On a series of main roads, I passed stuck, abandoned and out-of-control vehicles. Virtually the entire ride home was on what appeared to be untreated streets.
Is there a salt or plow shortage? Many people believe that the streets are cleaned only when school is in session; it certainly seems that way.
But what of us taxpayers? Do we not deserve a safe commute to or from work regardless of the status of the schools? Are the lives of commuters so unimportant to the state and municipalities that they provide serious road clearing only on the days when there's school?
I remember hearing a joke that a “government worker is a contradiction in terms.” I'm beginning to think it's true. Not only can the state and municipalities do a better job, we should demand that they do.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Bloomberg & coal
- Knives vs. guns I
- Knives vs. guns II
- Resurrection? Yes, really
- What would Ben say?
- Tragedy sensationalized
- Dingell’s lesson
- Consequences in space