Spending is the problem
Anyone who thinks Congress' job is to raise taxes and continue reckless spending should consider this Congress a howling success.
Anyone who thinks increasing taxes on the rich will solve our budget problems must have missed the '70s, when rates as high as 90 percent only produced tax shelters. By lowering all tax brackets — and capping the top bracket at 28 percent — President Reagan in the '80s decreased unemployment and almost doubled tax revenue.
Two years ago, President Obama said it was the wrong time to raise taxes on anyone. What has changed? Even Bill Clinton came out last year and said the president's decision to support tax hikes was wrong. Raising capital gains rates to 20 percent will discourage job-producing investment and hurt many retirees who depend on their 401(k)s.
The president has added another entitlement program, ObamaCare, which we can't afford, to an already-endangered Medicare.
Spending is the problem. We should not allow the media and this administration to demonize tea party and conservative legislators who believe that tackling this issue is more important than raising taxes or creating class warfare by demonizing the rich.
If these arguments seem irrational or foreign to you, check out Sen. Rand Paul's YouTube or C-SPAN videos for more common sense that should appeal to the common man.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- U.S. Steel worthy of grant
- ObamaCare solution
- Shame on Wolf
- Wrong on EPA water proposal
- Wolf is the right choice
- Barbour sentence shameful
- Ebola: No worries, right?
- Corbett, not Wolf
- Gun questions for mayor I
- Gun questions for mayor II
- Hospital’s hero & more